On 24/06/12 at 17:52 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2012-06-24 11:34, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: lintian > > Version: 2.5.9 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: wheezy sid > > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > amd64. > > > > Relevant part: > >> ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ > >> â Install lintian build dependencies (apt-based resolver) > >> â > >> ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ > >> > >> Installing build dependencies > >> Reading package lists... > >> Building dependency tree... > >> Reading state information... > >> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > >> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > >> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > >> or been moved out of Incoming. > >> The following information may help to resolve the situation: > >> > >> The following packages have unmet dependencies: > >> sbuild-build-depends-lintian-dummy : Depends: xz-lzma but it is not > >> installable > >> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. > >> apt-get failed. > > > > The full build log is available from: > > > > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/06/24/lintian_2.5.9_unstable.log > > > > A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at > > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! > > > > About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from > > Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every > > failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures. > > > > > > > > Hi, > > "Fun" case. I cannot really reproduce it, but I guess it has to do with > our "xz-lzma | lzma" build depedency. As far as I can tell, xz-lzma is > no longer available[1], but xz-utils now provides lzma[2]. > Given dpkg-dev is build essential there is no way (currently) for > xz-utils to be unavailable. I guess it is the "sbuild and virtual > packages" issue (or is it "first alternative only")?
Probably the "first alternative only" one, yes. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120624200117.gb18...@xanadu.blop.info
