Hi again,
I've sent that one too quickly. :-)
Axel Beckert wrote:
> > It seems that the command used is "aspell list -l en -p /dev/null" and
> > that Test::Spell has a "set_spell_cmd" that could be (ab)used for this
> > purpose. I have not tested it - but if it works in and outside a clean
> > chroot, I certainly do not mind having it in the test case.
>
> Having had a look at /usr/share/perl5/Test/Spelling.pm, I noticed that
> not aspell but spell from the package spell is Test::Spelling's top
> preference:
>
> sub spellchecker_candidates {
> # if they've specified a spellchecker, use only that one
> return $SPELLCHECKER if $SPELLCHECKER;
>
> return (
> 'spell', # for back-compat, this is the top candidate ...
> 'aspell list -l en -p /dev/null', # ... but this should become first
> soon
> 'ispell -l',
> 'hunspell -l',
> );
> }
[...]
> So having "spell" installed seems what made the lintian build fail.
So yes, hardcoding "aspell list -l en -p /dev/null" via set_spell_cmd
will fix this. And it will fix this in a less invasive way than a
"Build-Conflicts: spell" would do.
Will take care of it. Thanks for the helpful comments!
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150416213503.gq5...@sym.noone.org
