On Wed, 27 May 2015, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> I know, there at least we need to kill gcj support. But until then. Or
> we decide we don't care ab out 1.5/gcj now. Explicitely.
On Wed, 27 May 2015, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Niels and Emmanuel have already pointed out the most important facts why
> we can't support GCJ forever. My Java baseline is:
OK, let me rephrase my intent again.
I think it’s fair to drop GCJ support. But please do not so for
as long as doing that breaks GCJ architectures. That means, for
all affected packages, do maintainer uploads or NMUs *first*
that:
- change the B-D to require default-jdk only on an architecture
whitelist (do not use a blacklist, that makes bootstrapping
new architectures impossible_)
- change d/rules, d/control to only build the *-java packages
on those architectures
- ensure these changes are in sid *first*
Thanks!
bye,
//mirabilos
--
Yes, I hate users and I want them to suffer.
-- Marco d'Itri on gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lint-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.11.1505271502540.12...@tglase.lan.tarent.de
