Your message dated Mon, 19 Jun 2017 02:54:56 +0100 with message-id <1497837296.669174.1013553288.5b074...@webmail.messagingengine.com> and subject line Re: Bug#839861: lintian: init.d-script-needs-depends-on-lsb-base does not use strict enough lsb-base version for (eg.) status_of_proc has caused the Debian Bug report #839861, regarding lintian: init.d-script-needs-depends-on-lsb-base does not use strict enough lsb-base version for (eg.) status_of_proc to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 839861: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839861 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: lintian Version: 2.5.48 Severity: minor OdyX wrote: > here are more precise checks that could also be done; such as: > - any use of status_of_proc from /lib/lsb/init-functions needs > lsb-base (>= 3.2-14~) <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838997#37> Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Michael Biebl wrote: > > Shouldn't we just remove the version? oldstable has a recent enough > > version. 3.2-14 is from 2008. A dependency on lsb-base is enough and > > wouldn't trigger bugs like this where the version needs to be adjusted. > > Agreed. It's now even oldoldstable, so it seems safe to drop the version > requirement. Nod. Closing bug :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` [email protected] / chris-lamb.co.uk `-
--- End Message ---
