Hi! On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 18:02:00 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote: > Guillem Jover: > > Ah, I think it would be nice to explain something along these lines > > in the tag. I was rather confused by why the Makefile fragment was > > recommended over a simple already correct call. > > > > I'm also aware of few people who have a problem with the fragment as > > an interface. So having lintian emit tags over those and stating that > > they should be switched to the fragment might annoy people. > > Even with all the optimizations we have made in Debian (well, mostly > you), the "simple correct call" would still cause #793404 to a much > higher degree than the Makefile fragment that uses careful lazy > evaluation, wouldn't it?
Ah very good point, certainly! :) Ok, then if this is also reflected in the tag description, I'm fine, and if people are annoyed they can just override it or something. Thanks, Guillem