Hello kibi, On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Cyril" == Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> writes: > > Cyril> Hi, Felix Lechner <felix.lech...@lease-up.com> (2021-07-26): > > Cyril> cc-ing debian-policy@ for some possible feedback. > > Cyril> I'm not sure why we should be spending time tracking down > Cyril> Policy changes in (source for) udeb packages… so adding then > Cyril> updating this field to all our packages doesn't seem to do us > Cyril> any good. > > So, it seems fairly obvious to me that Standards-Version is important > for packages that produce both debs and udebs. > I'm assuming the focus of our discussion then is on source packages that > only produce udebs. > Have I got that right? > > By definition, most of the policy that affects binary packages does not > inherently apply to udebs. As I understand it, that's kind of the point > of udebs. Would you agree with this? You're only asking to stop seeing warnings about S-V for source packages which produce only udebs? -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature