On Wednesday 04 June 2008, 15:11:42, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > So please, this is not a battle for this particular commit, just that I'm > > scared about the your concepts of "cleanness", separation and "uglyness" > > [0] and "beauty" [0] required for future work.
> I'm sorry but I can't agree with you. If we don't force a style it can > be easier for you to work on that _today_ but it will be worse later. I agree with you, I want rules too. I just wanted to discuss this particular set of rules which I find time-consuming and not well suited for the purpose (which seems to be not "trashing git history" among others). Like using a nuclear bomb to kill mosquitos. > We can't accept exceptions and this works fine in many projects much > bigger then Debian Live, this will and does work fine for a small > project like Debian Live. I agree too, and I really think I was misunderstood by both you and Daniel, which is obviously my fault. Anyway, as I stated, I will adhere to the unwitten rules as they manifests, even if I seem to not agree with them and even if you do not like to discuss them. So expect 2 commits with no codying style change from me. As engineering teachs, there is a tradeoff between innovation and conservation, I just say that the rationale of your tradeoffs does not convice me, but I also think that this discussion took too much time for me (and maybe also for you) and I do not see ways to let my ideas penetrate without spending more time. So another tradeoff there. -- ESC:wq -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ debian-live-devel mailing list debian-live-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-live-devel