T o n g wrote: >> it should go into live-initramfs. i though this was implicit clear.
well, it depends on what the timeframe is. if you can show that it's working and the code is acceptable, and a proper patch against live-initramfs is made, then it can go in there now. > Although the current script depends on live-initramfs, IMHO, the > better approach is to spin out a common library into a separate package. > Because. ...otherwise it has to wait until the live-initramfs/live-initscripts split happens after lenny. which means optimistically something like february 2009. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
