On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 07:15, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 22:03:37 +0100 Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > This was meant to be applied only in the read-only portion of the live > > image filesystem, as it contains image IDs that makes sense for an > > immutable image to identify it, but not for an upgradable rootfs. If it > > gets copied to an installed disk then something went wrong somewhere > > and yeah it should be fixed. > > > > I am not really familiar with calamares so not surprised I missed it, > > if you know what to do would you be able to send a MR on Salsa to fix it > > please? > > I wonder about the rationale of the diversion. Is this to guard against > upgrades of base-files that happen *during* image creation? > > If the diversion is somehow useful during image creation, the easiest fix > might > be to just remove the diversion at the end of the image creation process. If > the diversion does not end up in the live system, then calamares cannot copy > it > over.
Yes that's exactly it, so yes what you propose should be just fine.
