Hi!

Is reporting problems with latest live-build git 'master' useful?  I'm
not sure if it make sense to report to the BTS because this isn't for a
released version, but hopefully early testing can help.  My perception
is that 'master' is kept in a workable and fairly stable state.  This
could of course be a simple user error.

I upgraded the Debian Deblob Live images scripts to use live-build git
master (8ce696ceb) and started to get an error:

P: Executing hook 
config/hooks/normal/5000-reproducible-timestamp-for-pool.hook.binary...
../config/hooks/normal/5000-reproducible-timestamp-for-pool.hook.binary: 21: 
ar: not found
P: 5000-reproducible-timestamp-for-pool.hook.binary Reproducible hook has been 
applied to pool-udeb
P: Executing hook 
config/hooks/normal/5010-reproducible-timestamp-for-installer-kernel.hook.binary...
../config/hooks/normal/5010-reproducible-timestamp-for-installer-kernel.hook.binary:
 9: unmkinitramfs: not found
E: 
config/hooks/normal/5010-reproducible-timestamp-for-installer-kernel.hook.binary
 failed (exit non-zero). You should check for errors.
E: An unexpected failure occurred, exiting...

https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/debian-deblob/debian-deblob-live/-/jobs/13329374966
https://debdistutils.gitlab.io/-/debian-deblob/debian-deblob-live/-/jobs/13329374966/artifacts/run.log

That hook seems to have been introduced recently, and things work before
the commit.

Should 'binutils' and 'initramfs-tools-bin' be added to debian/control
Depends?

Arguably, this could be an error in my building + install of live-build,
the logic is here:

https://codeberg.org/debian-deblob/debian-deblob-live/src/branch/main/container/setup.sh

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to