* Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > It would be great if you could comment on 2 proposed changes for FHS > 2.3. See the message I posted to the debian-lsb list (it's archived > at http://lists.debian.org/debian-lsb/2003/debian-lsb-200311/msg00009.html > and attached below). > /srv is a *very* good idea - it fixes a huge hole in the current LSB. Daniel Stone and I were trying to find a reasonable solution for this when implementing virtual hosting for apache2's packages, but every way we came up with for doing it violated the FHS to some degree or another. I think /srv is an excellent proposal and should be taken up ASAP. Cheers -Thom
> Please respond to debian-lsb. Thanks. > > > ----- Forwarded message from Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> ----- > > From: Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: FHS 2.3 and /srv & /media > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 15:13:31 +1100 > To: [email protected] > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i > > FHS 2.3 is about to be released RSN but there's some controversy over > /srv and /media. It would be good if Debian had an opinion about > this, so please look at the proposals and comment on them here. > > Addition of /srv: > http://bugs.freestandards.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16 > > Addition of /media: > http://bugs.freestandards.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27 > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > Martin Michlmayr > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
