Jeff Licquia writes... > We have completed our testing of woody with our patches. Remember, > these are at: > > http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/patches/woody/ > > with an apt repository at: > > deb[-src] http://hackers.progeny.com/~licquia/lsb/apt/ woody/ > > As far as we can tell, all technical issues have been resolved, and > woody with our patches will certify. This includes running > lsb-runtime-test, lsblibchk, and the application battery.
Are you talking about just i386 or ia64, pcc, s390 too? > Of course, no one's perfect, so it would be nice if someone could > provide an independent analysis. (Matt, is this something you could do? > Don't want to single you out, but OTOH you've been working on this > longer than anyone.) I think verification is a good idea and I'd be willing to do it if, * the patches are acceptable for a stable point release * you can provide a recipe for doing so. I assume this is just 1.) install woody 2.) apt-get upgrade from the above apt source 3.) run the tests Also I'd like to get unstable compliant as well. I think all patches should be applied in unstable first before allowing them stable. [snip] > Joey, if you have any objections to any of the patches, let me know. ... and please cc the debian-lsb list too. > Finally, there are some good reasons why it would be good to do this by > LinuxWorld (late January). I know that seems like it's rushing things a > bit, but if we can help in some way to make that possible, let us know. I think being ready for LinuxWorld would be really cool. -- Matt Taggart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
