On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mats Wichmann <[email protected]> wrote: > things have moved along and LSB has not been able to keep pace, anyway; > I have a strong suspicion (with only minor evidence so far) that distros > built using gcc5 aren't going to play fully with any LSB version.
If LSB can't keep up, then yeah, it's hard. In retrospect, specifying a package format may have been biting off more than they could chew. Focusing on just ABIs and having a small set of dependency group names from the start might have given them more of a chance. - Dan
