Hi Ben, 2015-04-12 1:38 GMT+02:00 Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>: > On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 01:05 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: > [...] >> I assume this situation is not unique to Wireshark. What do you think, >> what would be the best for the LTS project in Wireshark's case and >> what is the general LTS strategy in similar cases? > > I think the best approach would be either: > a. remove it from support and upload wireshark 1.8 to squeeze-backports > if possible, or > b. upload the backported wireshark 1.8 package to squeeze-lts I would be happy to go either of those options. Undoing the multiarch-related changes would make 1.8.x build fine on squeeze. Who should make the call?
Cheers, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-lts-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cak0odpyukqyyzbaiw4om652iyctawcbebbhn66rrh8myafn...@mail.gmail.com
