On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 02:39:26PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:31:23AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > Is there perhaps a way of thinking about this that I am missing? > > honest question: do you think it's too much work to update the notes > every other week? > I knew something was missing from my message :-)
I have no problem updating the notes weekly or so. That solution would also fit well with the current system. Would something as simple as this do the job? @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ python-urllib3 (Roberto C. Sánchez) -- python2.7 (Roberto C. Sánchez) NOTE: 20190321: Patches integrated for CVE-2018-14647, CVE-2019-5010, and CVE-2019-9636 - NOTE: 20190321: Waiting on upstream action for CVE-2019-9740 (roberto) + NOTE: 20190408: Waiting on upstream action for CVE-2019-9740 (roberto) -- python3.4 (Roberto C. Sánchez) NOTE: 20190321: Patches integrated for CVE-2018-14647 and CVE-2019-9636 That is, keep the same note just update the date. The reason I asked the question the way I did initially was because I had assumed (perhaps wrongly) that updating the note in this way might not be considered acceptable. In retrospect, I should have just given the example and then asked directly instead of the rather abstract question/situation I tried to explain at the first. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez