Hello,

Here are the notes from today's (or yesterday's, depending on your
timezone) meeting.


- Roll call
- New or departing team members:
        - Simon Quigley introduced himself
- Action item review:
    - Action: FD fellows to give feedback here:
      
https://gitlab.com/freexian/services/deblts-team/debian-lts/-/work_items/98 and
      check Emilio's mail to internal ML
      (<[email protected]>)
                - Assignee(s): FD fellows
        - Result: carry over to next meeting when Santiago will join and
          provide feedback
            - Action: Santiago to drop the urgency field from the
              additional data
- New topics (and eventual action items)
    - Offer help with reviewing security SPUs to the Release Team?
      Especially since our workflow is getting SPUs accepted before
      fixing LTS. Thoughts? (Beuc)
        - (utkarsh) I don't know how much they'd trust us with that? I
          know folks who'd like to not delegate this to us (and that's
          OK) and would rather review this themselves. Whilst I'm all
          for it, I fear we might do the same work twice and spend LTS
          money doing something that might be well spent somewhere else.
        - (utkarsh) +1 for trying, though, but I think we should have a
          clear communication with the Release team and their stance on
          it, of course.
        Action: Emilio to ask the Release team if they would be happy
        with our help on that.
        Action: Tobi do document that we should file bugs to let
        maintainer know about our intention to work on a package
    - Waiting for answer from the secteam or maintainers when we are
      working on LTS updates, blocking uploads for LTS/ELTS that would
      otherwise be ready -example zlib and regression update of
      libde265 (tobi)
    - Debusine news: ELTS staging to be moved to debusine (And this
      should also help to layout the work for an LTS staging repo)
      (santiago)
        - First step: Additional Debusine-level repository for
          collecting uploads
        - Criteria for packages added to the work queue (santiago)
        - Proposal: Only add packages to DLA-needed that we actually
          support and want to issue a DLA. Skip investigating others

- AOB
        - review queue (santiago)
        - Extra hours (santiago)
- Next meeting: 2026-11-26 14:00 UTC [Location: #debian-lts on IRC]
- MEETING APPENDIX: Discussion of technical questions/issues and reviews
    - none

Present:
    - tobi
    - Santiago
    - Jochen
    - Helmut
    - Chris L.
    - guilhem
    - Emilio
    - rouca
    - Andreas
    - Simon
    - Sylvain
    - Carlos
    - Faidon
    - Utkarsh - not present online, but reading the notes
    - Lee
    - Andreas Henriksson (ah)
Apologies:
    - Eamanu

Thanks to everyone for participating.

Best regards,

-- 
Santiago Ruano Rincón ◈ Freexian SARL
https://www.freexian.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to