On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Andreas Tille wrote: ... > OK, I'll do so at your advise but I'd like to repeat my impression that > I regard psycopg as a very good piece of software which is very actively > maintained and worth considering twice.
Karsten, We have been quite happy with psycopg as well. The OIO project migrated from PyGreSQL to Psycopg last year. A short description of migration rationale and issues are here: http://www.zope.org/Members/aho/oio_utils/ZPyGreSQL_to_ZPsycopg > > functionality GnuMed uses is at the DB-API level (and even > > there differences in adapters exist) but we do use low level > > stuff in gmBackendListener, for example, which is utterly > > non-standardised. I can't speak to your rationale for depending on "low level stuff". However, I have not encountered any reason to do so and can think of many reasons why it is a terrible idea. Best regards, Andrew --- Andrew P. Ho, M.D. OIO: Open Infrastructure for Outcomes www.TxOutcome.Org
