On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:48:42PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Steve M. Robbins wrote: > Lintian is criticising the source > package and thus removing the CVS directories from the unpackaged > build directory will not really help. If I'm not completely wrong > you have to build a new orig.tar.gz file to avoid these warnings.
No, you're right. I wasn't thinking clearly. Speaking personally, I wouldn't bother going to the effort of repackaging simply to avoid a warning about CVS in source. > >Finally, there's an unusual packaging scheme with a bunch > >of stuff under /usr/lib/CableSwig including a "bin" and "share" > >directories. These should be fixed. > > Well, the bin directory is fine if there are some executable binaries > that are called by a wrapper script from /usr/bin. Perhaps; but the more usual location would be /usr/lib/cableswig, rather than /usr/lib/CableSwig/bin. However, the binaries in question are those of gcc-xml which you agree should be packaged separately anyway. So the question now is more like: can cableswig be built to use an external gcc-xml? > The share directory should go to > /usr/share/cableswig Yes. -Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
