Hi, I would like to bring some reasoning about tagging medical applications into your focus. Since DebConf 5 last year in Helsinki I thought about tagging interesting applications for Debian-Med but had no time to work this out. While I'm continuousely thinking about this (without getting something done before summer this year probably) I just want to inform you about the plan. You might like to discuss this topic also on the debtags-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org list, if you want to support this idea.
Kind regards Andreas. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:32:50 -0400 From: Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Custom Debian Distributions <debian-custom@lists.debian.org> Cc: "debtags-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org" <debtags-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>, Debian Junior <debian-jr@lists.debian.org> Subject: Re: [proposal] Simplified junior tags & debtags-based replacement for metapackages Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:32:57 -0600 (CST) Resent-From: debian-jr@lists.debian.org On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 12:05 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
For the moment I have the <something> in mind that fits the metapackages med-<something> If I would be really sure that this is the best idea I would have just done it. (Comments are welcome.)
Well, my thoughts about that are that any such aspect of the software is better as an aspect of the software itself, distinct from the CDD. For instance, med-pharmacy depends on chemtool which has these tags: Tag: field::chemistry, interface::x11, role::sw:application, uitoolkit::gtk, use::editing, works-with::image:vector, works-with::image:vector:svg, x11::application If Debian-med discovers that this package is good for the field of pharmaceutical research, I see no reason why there should not be new tag field::pharmaceutical-research, and that chemtool should be tagged with it. In fact, my idea for cdd::* tags can be implemented using an existing debtags aspect, "suite::" (described as "The package is related to a bigger group of packages"). In the case of chemtool, in addition to adding the new field:: tag, I would add suite::med:core. A user could then ask for all suite::med:core packages, just the suite::med:core packages in field::pharmaceutical-research, or cherry-pick tags from various different fields, depending on how much of the whole Debian-Med CDD they wish to install. None of the modularity of the existing metapackages is lost, and in fact, quite a bit more modularity is gained. Furthermore, it is possible using this classification system to have new packages tagged field::pharmceutical-research, yet not be tagged suite::med:core (as hard as that may be to imagine for this particular case, since we as yet have so few choices in this area ... but please bear with me for the purpose of illustration). Packages that are deemed 'not yet solid enough' or redundant can therefore enter Debian, be tagged with appropriate tags so Debian-Med users might try them, and be developed to the point where they are finally suitable to enter Debian-Med. Ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]