Hi, On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 08:56:51AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2008, Michael Hanke wrote: > >> I haven't looked at the package yet, but maybe it would make sense for >> me to strip it down to the actually useful parts. If the overall popcon >> count is low, it might really be just a dev lib. > > So the action to do seems to be quite simple: Michael, could you take > over the work to strip down the ctn package to the things you need, put > this under group maintenance and upload. Not sure if that is the proper order of events ;-)
I'd like to hear the oppinion of the ctsim maintainer first (CC'ed), whether a stripped down version of ctn is sufficient for his needs (and what can actually be stripped down). Kevin: What do you think about CTN as a dependency of ctsim. Are there plan to move the something else instead. What is the actual functionality of CTN that is used by ctsim? Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke ICQ: 48230050 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
