Le Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:47:42PM +0100, Michael Hanke a écrit :
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:10:25PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> > > 
> > >   dicomscope package is shipped with old documentation (for dicomscope
> > > 3.5.1). Instead the proper pdf should be the one from:
> > > 
> > > ftp://dicom.offis.de/pub/dicom/offis/software/dscope/dscope360/docs/
> > 
> > Maybe you can see if Upstream is willing to fix the issue. This would save 
> > you
> > the work :)
> Please pardon my ignorance, but is a PDF itself not considered
> problematic since it is most likely not the 'source'?

Hi Michael,

If I understood correctly, the issue is that Upstream has documentation version
3.6.0 on their website, but source tarball version 3.6.0 contains the
documentation 3.5.1.

Instead of repacking a corrected tarball for Debian, I recommend to suggest
Upstream to publish a tarball version 3.6.0.1 (or whichever), with the updated
documentation.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to