On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:06:09PM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote: > You mean on wiki.debian.org, I presume.
Yes. > The detailed descriptions of the projects should > indeed be on the wiki. And their reference from Debian Med ... hm ... could > be there, too. > It is a matter of taste, I think. Sure. I'm not that a big fan of Wikis - but in your case it might have been a nice way to get something done quickly for a short term solution. But I have seen your SVN commit and it's fine as well - so I don't care about the form as long as it gets realised in any form. > I'd like to have the pointer to the projects be tied > more closely to the core Debian Med pages. Also, with the style sheets and > templates we'd > have some technical advantages that help to get a consistent presentation > across all the > pages and entries. Admittedly, though, static pages with svn are mostly like > a wiki. Yes. Fine for me as you did it. > Would > you mind testing it underneath Debian Med and we move it out when we find it > disturbing? What do you mean with "testing". It's just pointing your browser to http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org/organisations.xml right? This is fine for me. If you are mentioning consistent layout I would probably miss the menu etc from the http://debian-med.alioth.debian.org entry page. At least a link back would not harm. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de Klarmachen zum Ă„ndern! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org