On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote: > Am Montag, den 28.09.2009, 16:40 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: > > In the case of Mafft, we definitely want the ???without-extensions??? > > version, as > > the extensions are non-free. I do not know how to treat this case, but maybe > > the best way to let our users know that we use only the free part is to keep > > ???-without-extensions??? in the version number? > > I do not know Mafft but I think the description is a much better place > for such information. I feel a little uneasy with information about a > package encoded into the version number. (With the obvious exception of > "dfsg".)
I tend to agree with Manuel and will commit a versionmangled watch file that should deal with this issue. I'd rather be concerned about the "Beta" status expressed on the web site. I think I will put the package in a "looks clean from a Debian point of view but needs testing before upload state". Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org