On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:02:43PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > While working on the machine-readable format for Debian copyright files, I > realised that there are several good reasons to not use the same format as for > Debian control files (which actually does not comply with RFC822).
What exactly are the reasons that it is not RFC822 compliant? I did not dived into this into very detail, but I'm curious because we are using this format in the tasks files and I'm using a Python RFC822 library to parse them. > I think that the chances I propose make the machine-readable Debian copyright > files much more human-readable. See for another example libbio-scf-perl: OK. Sounds reasonable. I'm watching your efforts from a distant ... > About your other question: I tend to chose CDBS when I forsee that compilation > flags may have to be tuned, because it is more straightforward to do so with > CDBS in my opinion. OK. Feel free to choose whatever you like more. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org