On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:33:46AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > debian/autodock.upstream-metadata.yaml
> > debian/autodock-getdata.upstream-metadata.yaml
This use implies that the file is related to the binary package which is
definitely not the case. (Upstream is just not thinking in categories
like binary packages.)
However, I admit that it might make perfectly sense to have different
citations on different binary packages.
> Your email reminds me that I need to make a nice proof of principle now that
> the data is loaded in the UDD. Perhaps we can consider increasing the
> complexity
> of the system only after that ?
Doing it step by step is correct but as I said above it is not only the
number of citations we need to worry about but also the assigning those
citations to different parts of the source - which is somehow in
contrast to have information *about* the source. The increased
complexity should reflect / resolve this conflict.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
