On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:21:33PM +0100, Johan Henriksson wrote: > > I can not really see in how far this fits into the > > > > *medical* *specific* hardware drivers > > > > suggested above. So I'm hesitating a bit advertising quite generic > > stuff as medical relevant. But people working with this in their > > day to day medical life might prove me wrong here. > > > > I totally approve of this package. It is very welcome, in the context of > micromanager
Do you mean in the context of micromanager as a dependency (like libc6, python, perl or whatever any package might depend from) or because libpvcam *itself* has some relevance for medical care. The package is there and you can use it in micromanager - but we should not collect any "random" dependency in our metapackages. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111209134211.gu20...@an3as.eu