On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:24:13 +0100
Andreas Tille <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMHO it is close to OK.  The thing is that you are using the very same
> name for the changed tarball as your original upstream tarball.  I have
> no idea whether you would like to follow Charles' and append "~dfsg" to
> the version string or whatever (sorry, forgot to mention this after my
> changes).

Hi Andreas, 
I have just committed this change and now the version is 0.2.1~dfsg.

Kind regards,
-- 
Leonardo Robol <[email protected]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to