Le Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 06:35:03PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > Hmmm, I wonder in how far you consider only med-bio as a target for > Ume(ga)ya? Several Debian Science packages would profit from this as > well?
Hi Andreas, any package that is known by debcheckout and that is stored in a Subversion repository is a ready for umegaya. The support of packages stored in Git is limited to Alioth, unfortunately. This is because Git lacks nice commands such as ‘svn cat $URL’. You also described a similar limitation: > find /git/debian-med -name upstream-metadata.yaml > find /git/debian-science -name upstream-metadata.yaml The Git bare repositories, like the Subversion repositories, do not keep directly a copy of the files. You can interrogate them, but only locally. wagner:/git/debian-med$ for repo in *.git ; do (cd $repo ; git ls-tree master debian/ | grep upstream-metadata.yaml > /dev/null && echo "$repo"); done ball.git beeswarm.git bwa.git clustalw.git clustalx.git emboss.git libbio-graphics-perl.git perlprimer.git r-bioc-edger.git r-bioc-limma.git samtools.git fatal: Not a valid object name master The above command stops at sitplus.git because it does not have a master branch (it has a debian branch), but there must be a better way to to interrogate the default branch that would be obtained when cloning the repository. Back to the original quiestion, nothing prevents from using umegaya for Debian Science as well, except perhaps that it may be preferable to first fix the details in Debian Med before going on a larger scale. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
