On Feb 1, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Tony Travis wrote: > Hi, Josh. Hi Tony,
> I followed OMERO Unix/Linux installation walk-through, and I think it is > worth packaging OMERO to simplify the installation process. There we agree wholeheartedly. :) > However, I also think it would be good to use Bio-Linux as a platform for > OMERO. I have no experience with Bio-Linux, but a specific Bio-Linux walkthrough may well be in our users' interest. > I have a more pragmatic short-term view about packaging OMERO than Andreas, > but he is right about identifying what is and is not GPL in your > distribution. I understand that OMERO is developed under GPL, so you will > need to identify dependencies with non-GPL licences anyway. Licenses are all specified under: https://github.com/openmicroscopy/openmicroscopy/blob/master/lib/licenses/README Run-time GPL requirements: Ice and assorted JQuery plugins Build-time GPL requirements: JarBundler, NSIS > I tried the ant 'clean' target in your build file, but I wonder if it is > possible to do the equivalent of "make dist-clean' in the source directory to > create pristine 'upstream' sources for Debian packaging? At the moment, we rely on git for that ("git clean -fXd") but it certainly wouldn't cause any problems to have a dist-clean target that does the same thing. > Thanks, > Tony. Cheers, ~Josh. P.S. Added Allan LeSage to the CC (also on ome-devel) since he's interested in getting involved. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
