On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:35:35PM -0500, Luis Ibanez wrote: > >> As a last resort for the *initial* packaging it might work out. Once we > >> are doing the real packaging we should not try such dirty tricks. > > > > Now that we can generate a mumps compiler by way of > > compiling only C code I wonder whether there's still a need > > to separate between "initial" and "real" packaging ? After > > all, no "bootstrapping" is needed anymore ?
... > I believe Andreas was using "initial" as in "version 0.1" > of the packaging, e.g. the first quick and dirty way of > getting it done, and then revising it to follow better > practices and cleaner methods to become a "version 1.0". I understand. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120215174359.gc2...@hermes.hilbert.loc