On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:02:16AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > > May I kindly suggest -- if there's a choice to be had -- that > > you might consider choosing PostgreSQL as the backend, which, > > among those > > > > DbaseIII, MySQL, Postgres and SqLite > > > > listed here > > > > http://ingenium.home.xs4all.nl/dicom.html > > > > is the one any sane clinical deployment would like to > > use (short of Mumps, maybe). > > Any sane clinical deployment would *not* use Conquest: > http://bugs.debian.org/680352#12 :-P
I get your point. However, most if not any software will contain such bugs. Good that you brought them up, that's better than NOT knowing about them. > BTW DCMTK has been compiled and tested with hardening flags and proven > to work very well, it is a very robust and mature SCP server. If this is meant to suggest, that, indeed, Debian does offer a DICOM server then you are probably correct -- technically speaking. However, Debian would mainly benefit from a more turn-key-y solution. It's a bit like having fis-gtm but not having VistA (just yet). Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140127094926.ga4...@hermes.hilbert.loc