Sorry, spoke too soon. I noted the missing dependencies there. Once
installed, it gets further and then fails at compile with
[javac]
phyutility/src/jebl/gui/trees/treeviewer_dev/TreePane.java:495: error:
reference to Painter is ambiguous, both interface javax.swing.Painter in
javax.swing and interface jebl.gui.trees.treeviewer_dev.painters.Painter in
jebl.gui.trees.treeviewer_dev.painters match

BUNCH OF STUFF AND THEN....

BUILD FAILED
phyutility/build.xml:7: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for
details.

Total time: 8 seconds
make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `phyutility'
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
debuild: fatal error at line 1364:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -i -I failed
gbp:error: Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I': debuild -i -I returned 29

Does that look more like it? If so, seems like the solution is me fixing
the phyutility code and then bringing it back in, correct? (At least since
I am the developer of phyutility this seems like the easiest thing).

Take care,
Stephen


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stephen Smith <black...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andreas
>
> OK. When I do git-buildpackage (no arguments) in the directory I have been
> working in, I get
>  dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -i -I
> dpkg-buildpackage: source package phyutility
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version 2.6-1
> dpkg-buildpackage: source distribution UNRELEASED
> dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>
>  dpkg-source -i -I --before-build phyutility
> dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: javahelper default-jdk
> libjebl2-java
> dpkg-buildpackage: warning: build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied;
> aborting
> dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use -d flag to override.)
> debuild: fatal error at line 1364:
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -D -us -uc -i -I failed
> gbp:error: Couldn't run 'debuild -i -I': debuild -i -I returned 29
>
> Is this the error you were getting? I am looking at the git-buildpackage
> documentation but am having a little difficulty determining when the
> arguments are necessary (despite the fact that I understand arguments).
>
> Take care,
> Stephen
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 01:17:17PM -0500, Stephen Smith wrote:
>> > All sounds good. OK, I have done an initial commit so you can check out
>> > where I am at.
>>
>> I was really curious where you are at and thus I took the freedom to do
>> two commits:
>>
>>   1. Adapt changelog version to the injected upstream version
>>      (otherwise git-buildpackage would not have worked).
>>   2. Use default-jdk (instead of an outdated JDK)
>>
>> So the build at least starts but runs into an error you most probably
>> will be able to reproduce (hopefully).
>>
>> Please confirm thyt you can run git-buildpackage and the build problem
>> can be reproduced at your side.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>         Andreas.
>>
>> --
>> http://fam-tille.de
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
>> listmas...@lists.debian.org
>> Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140304185716.gc16...@an3as.eu
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to