Le Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 05:37:10PM +0000, Booth, Timothy G. a écrit :
>
> If the list likes this approach, then we can continue annotating a bit more
> and amend our task pages for it all. Some tools and suites (eg. EMBOSS) have
> existing annotations from other projects that we can inherit. We are not yet
> confident about what this effectively means e.g. for the Ultimate Debian
> Database. @Charles, can you direct us, please?
Hi Tim and Steffen,
the UDD only contains bibliographic information:
key | count
-----------+-------
issn | 24
type | 17
editor | 6
pmid | 320
address | 1
author | 484
bibtex | 490
journal | 461
refid | 187
book | 1
doi | 397
year | 484
license | 1
titile | 1
publisher | 9
rank | 187
month | 6
in | 2
url | 435
package | 187
comment | 5
title | 482
eprint | 323
volume | 441
article | 5
pages | 444
isbn | 2
files | 1
booktitle | 12
number | 359
See https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata for details.
Have a nice week-end,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141122015528.gc15...@falafel.plessy.net
