Hi Andreas, apologies for the delayed reply, somehow I missed the earlier message.
I think the suggestion for naming is fine. Cheers, -Aaron On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 09:27 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > if I will not hear anything in contrary to my suggestion I assume > agreement to my suggestion to name the package mauveAligner and > profressiveMauve CLI tools progressivemauve and the package containig > the Mauve GUI mauvealigner. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 08:30:19AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi again Aaron, > > > > I'm basically hesitating with uploading since I'm waiting for your final > > opinion about the package names. Perhaps my last mail was to long and I > > cutted it down to the naming discussion. The essence might be to name > > the commandline tool package containing mauveAligner and > > progressiveMauve simply > > > > progressivemauve > > > > (since as far as I understood this is the prefered aligner) and than we > > can name the Mauve package containung the GUI > > > > mauvealigner > > > > What do you think? > > > > Kind regards > > > > Andreas. > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:29:06PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > > > > well, this genome alignment software was first released to the world in > > > > 2003 and development began in 2001, but setting aside the issue of who > > > > came first I think it would be fine to call the package mauve-aligner or > > > > something like that. I am less enthusiastic about renaming the `Mauve` > > > > wrapper script simply to avoid naming conflicts with someone else's > > > > software because that would involve some substantial revision to the > > > > documentation and possibly breaking dependent tools. > > > > > > Hmmm, I think mauve-aligner would be a bad choice if we leave the > > > package containing mauveAligner and progressiveMauve with mauvealigner. > > > The dash as only distinction in the package name sounds a bit weak. > > > What about > > > > > > mauvealigner-gui ? > > > > > > As I said its possible to leave the name "mauve" for the wrapper - > > > possibly also "Mauve" with upper case (please confirm that you prefer > > > the upper case version). > > > > > > > > g-mauve > > > > > genome-mauve > > > > > ? (do you have some better suggestion) > > > > > > > > i think mauve-aligner would be more natural. > > > > > > If you really stick to this would you suggest a different name for the > > > package carrying the command line applications? May be > > > "progressivemauve" aus package name might be a better choice? > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for taking the time to read this longish mail. Any hints > > > > > and recommendations regarding the packaging are highly appreciated. > > > > > > > > -- > > http://fam-tille.de > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > [email protected] > > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432100896.13832.174.camel@calumet
