Hi, Andreas, On الأربعاء 22 تـمـوز 2015 21:55, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Maybe we should send the test log upstream to see if there is a solution >> available. > > Good idea. I had debugging switched on to support this. Do you have > contact to upstream anyway and would take over this? >
Yes, I can do that. >>> In any case I think we should try to bring back the separate tests >>> package (whatever name it might get) and find a way to run the tests >>> since IMHO this is the way to ensure that the modules are running >>> properly. >>> >>> Any opinions? >> >> The autopkgtests ran properly the way I had configured it (besides the >> problem with multiarch renaming). > > May be we ignore this multiarch thing for the moment and discuss it with > Debian Python team while users (and dependencies) could at least profit > from an updated python-pysam. > >> Do you mean to put back the configuration >> where the autopkgtest runner depends on a separate python-pysam-tests >> package? In order to upload soon, I suggest that we put back the tests >> package for the user, but keep autopkgtest independent of it in order to >> work with Debian CI. > > Yes. Keeping the test package has the additional advantage that it does > not need another passing the new queue. :-) > > OK, since this is solved now I would be really happy if you could > finalise it in the sense above. This leaves me time to help on the > medical imaging side where also some autoremovals are pending. > No problem. > > PS: Hope your DM application will be accepted soon. I just have sended > my ACK. > Thanks for your prompt advocacy :) I was able to quickly send the jetring changeset afterwards. I think I'm all done from my side and just have to wait now. Regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55b08cb5.6020...@ghraoui.name