Hi Afif, I'd like to come back to this plan:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:21:47AM -0700, Afif Elghraoui wrote: > > However, even if we have discussed this before the situation is that if > > we recommend biologists to install med-bio and med-bio-dev they end up > > with an installation without cwltool. One way to fix this is to add > > science-tools to the Dependencies of med-bio. Alternatively I do not > > see any problem in mentioning cwltool in science-tools *and* med-bio - > > finally it does not harm to advertise good things in more than one > > place. What do you think? > > > > This also came up before [1] :). We decided to go with making > science-tools itself a Suggests by med-bio and med-imaging. I mistakenly > wrote it as debian-science-tools, which you subsequently fixed in this > commit: I checked why science-tools is not a metapackage (I should have checked at debian-science upload time :-() and noticed that science/tasks/tools says: Metapackage: false and the reason is given in the description of the task: Note that there is no according metapackage created since the packages might be to different to make sense to install all on one machine. I think this reason has a point - so we come back to the discussion how to get a sensible dependency between cwltool and our tasks ... Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de