2018-03-05 17:57 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu>: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:07:08PM +0200, Michael Crusoe wrote: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=cwltool > > > > Hey all, > > > > I just noticed that cwltool is no longer in unstable. Any hints as to why > > this happened? > > > > I can't find any bug report requesting its removal either: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive= > both;dist=unstable;include=subject%3Acwltool;package=ftp.debian.org > > Strange. > > > Seems rather rude to do without notification.. > > I do not think that anybody was specifically "rude": >
Hopefully you are right :-P $ rmadison cwltool > cwltool | 1.0.20170114120503-1~bpo8+1 | jessie-backports | source, all > cwltool | 1.0.20170114120503-1 | stable | source, all > cwltool | 1.0.20180211183944-2 | testing | source, all > cwltool | 1.0.20180225105849-1 | unstable | source > > Also > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cwltool > > has links to unstable. The explanation is that the source only upload > did not build: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cwltool Yes, and I fixed this in my upload of 1.0.20180225105849-2 last Wednesday (as evidenced in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=891752#8) But I got no response until I tried uploading an even newer version today; then the double reject. -- Michael R. Crusoe Co-founder & Lead, Common Workflow Language project <http://www.commonwl.org/> Direktorius, VšĮ "Darbo eigos", Vilnius, Lithuania https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-9670 <https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-2961-9670> m...@commonwl.org
