Hello,
I just procrastinated a bit into using the comfort of salsa to update
debian/upstream/metadata and here the references to SciCrunch, OMICtools
and bio.tools registries. All three registries have improved their
coverage enormously over the past few months. I am deeply impressed.
Anyway. I came across
* one or two entries that had perfect RRID descriptions on salsa but
not on our task page - does the package need to be re-uploaded for the
change to become visible?
* belvu and blixem that are from the same source package but have
different task entries and also separate catalog entries in all three
registries. This breaks the current UDD schema. I have annotated it now
as ['belvu','blixem'] (for bio.tools, the others analogously).
Ideas for improvements anyone? Or is this how it should be for now?
Best,
Steffen
