On Wed, 23 May 2018 at 20:36 Aaron M. Ucko <u...@debian.org> wrote:
> Liubov Chuprikova <chuprikov...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Please, have a look at my two last commits (
> > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-tools6/commits/master). Actually,
> > the first one was made a month ago.
>
> All looks good except for one formality -- Lintian considers your
> additions to debian/copyright to be incomplete:
>
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph
> at line 16)
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
> (paragraph at line 16)
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph
> at line 24)
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
> (paragraph at line 24)
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph
> at line 30)
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
> (paragraph at line 30)
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph
> at line 35)
> W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright
> (paragraph at line 35)
>
> (It also issues a few unrelated complaints, which I'll be happy to
> address myself.)
>
I cannot reproduce the same lintian output on my computer. I tried it like
this:
lintian -i -I --show-overrides
ncbi-tools6_6.1.20170106-3_amd64.changes
I mistakenly decided that if NCBI copyright had already mentioned I could
skip it
for test data files as they were also taken from NCBI, except one...
trnascan-se_sample.output
I generated that file by running *trnascan-se* (another Debian Med
package), so I have no
idea what the license and copyright should be written for it. Could you
help me with this
problem?
__
Liubov
