On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:39:15AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > I would be happy to move it to salsa. I just pointed to it as the one > > we currently use > > > > I guess I would then move it to dcm2niix-epoch1 smth like that (on salsa > > i.e.) so previous versions could be found from the original > > dcm2niix repo (to which I would also add a commit obliterating > > everything and stating to look into that -epoch1 repo) > > > > Please use the original packaging work on salsa and keep the history intact. > > I don't see what would prevent you from rebasing the work done on > Neurodebian on top of mine. Epoch bumps don't justify history rewrites or > new repositories, imo.
I agree with Ghislain. Feel free to simply rebase your packaging but please keep the same repository name. We have the policy that the package resides in a repository with the same name as the source package (and some of our tools are relying on this) and I do not see any reason to diverge from it. There is also no point in keeping an unused repository of the old packaging around. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de