Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > Sorry, my fault. Pushed now.
Thanks! I'd initially thought I was looking at a single cascade of errors, but there turned out to be three separate problems here: - Wrong CTPL, now addressed. - References to iit<...> and iitii<...> without explicit iitii:: namespace prefixes, easy to address formally. - More fundamentally, a builder type mismatch -- iit<...> and iitii<...> are specifically geared to work with iit_mm_builder_base<...>, which requires the name of a backing file to use as its first argument, whereas the test code (and the header's comments) appear to assume plain iit_builder_base<...>, which takes no such argument. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/[email protected]
