On Tuesday, August 11, 2020 2:43:09 A.M. CDT Gert Wollny wrote: > > No, I think you did the right thing. I actually like the tag > > "upstream/ 4.13.3-dfsg1+data" that you used. It provides a hint > > that it is not the bare upstream tarball. > > > > All we need to do is call the source "4.13.3-dfsg1+data-1" and then > > "gbp buildpackage" will create the source+data tarball. > > +1 > > Using more than one tarball is really a nuisance, I as just not bold > enough to try to get only one.
OK, it seems consensus is for one tarball. It turns out that the tag using "xxx+data" does not work -- the '+' character seems to create problems during configuration. I switched to using "4.13.3withdata-dfsg1" as the upstream version. I will push that later today unless someone can suggest a better tag -- without a '+'. The build still fails on amd64 as discussed. On my i386 chroot build, there are even more failures: steve@riemann:~/Packages/insighttoolkit/build-area$ grep '\*Failed' *build insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:1511/2912 Test #1522: itkAccumulateImageFilterTest ..................................................***Failed 0.10 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:1514/2912 Test #1525: itkGetAverageSliceImageFilterTest .............................................***Failed 0.06 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2463/2912 Test #2471: itkHuangThresholdImageFilterTestShort .........................................***Failed 0.09 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2464/2912 Test #2472: itkIntermodesThresholdImageFilterTestShort ....................................***Failed 0.09 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2465/2912 Test #2473: itkIsoDataThresholdImageFilterTestShort .......................................***Failed 0.09 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2466/2912 Test #2474: itkKittlerIllingworthThresholdImageFilterTestShort ............................***Failed 0.08 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2467/2912 Test #2475: itkLiThresholdImageFilterTestShort ............................................***Failed 0.08 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2468/2912 Test #2476: itkMaximumEntropyThresholdImageFilterTestShort ................................***Failed 0.07 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2470/2912 Test #2477: itkMomentsThresholdImageFilterTestShort .......................................***Failed 0.04 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2471/2912 Test #2481: itkTriangleThresholdImageFilterTestShort ......................................***Failed 0.06 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2472/2912 Test #2480: itkShanbhagThresholdImageFilterTestShort ......................................***Failed 0.06 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2473/2912 Test #2482: itkYenThresholdImageFilterTestShort ...........................................***Failed 0.06 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2474/2912 Test #2478: itkOtsuThresholdImageFilterTestShort ..........................................***Failed 0.08 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2475/2912 Test #2479: itkRenyiEntropyThresholdImageFilterTestShort ..................................***Failed 0.08 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2837/2912 Test #2772: DicomSliceReadPythonTest ......................................................***Failed 4.55 sec insighttoolkit4_4.13.3withdata-dfsg1-1_i386.build:2869/2912 Test #2826: ImageRegistrationHistogramPlotterTest .........................................***Failed 19.20 sec These are all WITHOUT changing the patch set. Regards, -Steve
