Hello,
On 2024-03-29 06:43, Nilesh Patra wrote:> There are also packages inside
debian med umbrella which are not necessarily related to medicine or
bioinformatics. These include some general purpose python packages, some
C/C++ libraries et. al. There are packages that reverse-depend on the
same. I don't think it's a good idea to remove 32 bit support in *all*
the packages that are under our umbrella, but probably only the ones
that are end-user applications.
It may be good to move packages not related to medicine to different teams over
time but some of them actually don't fit into any availability team as per my
understanding and may have to be moved to debian/ namespace.
I think Nilesh raises very important points. Personally I see no problem
in leaving arch:any in debian/control and from time to time RMing the
failing architectures.
Best wishes,
Andrius
