Hi Martin,
Am Wed, Jun 03, 2026 at 11:28:30AM +0200 schrieb Martin Uecker:
> > I converted d/watch to version=5 and was running `routine-update`.
> > Since this was running `lrc` I stumbled upon some missings in
> > d/copyright which I fixed. I uploaded the result but when doing the
> > license checking I stumbled upon a code copy of lapacke. I wonder
> > whether you might rather prefer the Debian packaged library to build
> > bart.
>
> Thank you!
You are welcome.
> The lapacke copy is not used for Debian,
> we still have in the upstream github to support some
> users that build from source on specific systems where
> it is not available.
That's perfectly fine. I personally tend to exclude unused code via
Files-Excluded in d/copyright. On one hand this makes very obvious that
the code is not used and on the other hand there is no need to mention
it in d/copyright (which is actually the reason why I stumbled upon it).
I'll leave it to your decision whether you want to deliver a stripped
source tarball for Debian or not. Both is fine.
> > Just ping here if you need sponsoring help for this.
>
> I will look at GPU-support later, but I guess there will also
> be some issues already with the non-GPU version on some
> architectures which I would focus on first.
OK.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
