On 09/06/2026 10.01, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Flavien, I considered an easy task to solve s/libogre-1.12-dev/libogre-14-dev/ (bug #1138262) which would probably been possible even with the previous version. Unfortunately we did run into a reproducibly issue with version 26.0.0 and this became a thing now in Debian since it is requried that packages that once builded reproducibly have to keep this feauture. I admit I'm not sufficiently experienced - but here is the log claiming its not reproducible: https://reproduce.debian.net/amd64/api/v1/builds/260073/artifacts/669451/diffoscope Can you have a look into this?
I've also had issues with `NT_GNU_BUILD_ID` variation, which can apparently be caused by the build directory having different content. Enabling https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Validate_package_cleanup for local test builds (and fixing that) did eliminate some variations. https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sourmash/-/commit/17bead69dba11468c5609dfdfa344bb257ad8a15#line_8756c6349_A24 Discussing in https://matrix.to/#/#debian-reproducible:matrix.debian.social helped; they found an issue with their builders and after one of the volunteers confirmed that my affected packaged rebuilt identically for them, elbrus manually hinted it to bypass the check for now. https://matrix.to/#/!PxQXvJcWCKuxoWaMLB:matrix.debian.social/$XMzhg7qRglhBvpDgHZnnYH_NJdwb61NFKnx9DfDOcaM They are also looking at enabling running debrebuild on the porter boxes. Currently blocked by RT#10010. I hope this helps! -- Michael
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
