Jürgen A. Erhard wrote:
> There are patches that simply cannot be backported. There are others
> that are hard to backport even for the upstream maintainers who are
> *deep* into the code.
>
> So demanding of a "packager" to "always be able to backport" is too
> strong.
fwiw: granted.
> [I find it hard not to get as slightly ad-hominem as you got, Joey :-|]
Wus? Please send me a German translation for me in priv mail.
> PS: I do agree that people should be able to understand the language
> their package is written in.
Ok.
> But understanding it and backporting
> something is *very* different.
Ok.
Regards,
Joey
--
GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
