Personally, I would use the source package's version # in this case. The
docs may be fairly version-dependent (i.e. openacs 4.0 may change a great
deal of things, and openacs-docs 4.0 would document the new interfaces), so
sharing version numbers makes it much clearer...
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 02:16:43AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake forth:
> Hi,
>
> I recently adopted openacs package.
>
> Upstream FTP site provides 2 packages : openacs-3.2.5.tar.gz and
> openacs-3.2.5-docs.tar.gz.
>
> How should I version-number the doc package ? Would openacs-docs_1.0 be OK or
> shoud I try to stick to binaries package version for now and the future ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: 0x3B047084 7FC7 0DC0 EF31 DF83 7313 FE2B 77A8 F36A 3B04 7084
Behind every great man, there is a woman -- urging him on.
- Harry Mudd, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
