christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:32:39AM +0100, David Spreen wrote: > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > > > christophe barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Just done that and finally got the following on the base directory: > > > > > gphoto2-2.0beta3.orig.tar.gz > > > > > > > > Yes, it has to be gphoto2_2.0beta3.orig.tar.gz > > > > See? It has to be a _ not a - between the packagename and the version- > > > > number. > > > > > > > > so long... > > > > > > That's it. > > > Thanks > > > > Did you see my advices ? > > About 2.0beta3 and 2.0-beta3 ? > If so, yes. > But as you can read in replys to your mail, the situation is already > there (2.0beta2 is in the archive).
No, I added some remarks afterwards, i.e. in order to avoid the epoch, the final release would be 2.0final, because 2.0final > 2.0beta. Then for the next releases, when you want to use beta, you can use 2.0.99beta for 2.1 beta releases and 2.1 for the final one. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
