> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 03:09:58PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > > > > The current gphoto2 release is 2.0beta5 wich is packaged as > 2.0beta5. > > > > > For the final release 2.0, I will package it as 2.0final. > > > > > > > > > > What would be the best numbering scheme for the next beta series > to > > > > > avoid the use of final for the stable release ?
I don't know about the best, but something that worked for me is, supposing the previous version was 1.7, to name the betas 1.7-2.0beta1 etc... and then move to 2.0. 1.7-2.0beta1 is > 1.7, and 2.0 is > 1.7-2beta1. But... Wouldn't it be nice to have dpkg understand "alpha/beta" in version numbers? YA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
