On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:11:25AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > Upon rereading, I see what you're asking here. You're worried that if > you sign a uid that doesn't have his name on it, and he adds another uid > later that does have a name on it (not necessarily his), this will > mistakenly be accepted by the DAM as identification, correct? Honestly, > I don't believe DAM is that sloppy, and I wouldn't worry about it... > Given how often people complain about the process being slow, I think > it's clear that DAM takes the job very seriously :)
So you understand my problem. You think the NM process is flawless in this regard. Do you think that with all the verifications I have done, I can sign his key and by this way indicate that I know that this key belong to the well known person. Christophe > > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer -- Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E People that hate cats will come back as mice in their next life. --Faith Resnick
msg06053/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
